GOOD, BETTER, BEST
Choose a language
Français
Deutsch
Español
Italiano
Português
Nederlands
Русский
中文
Türkçe
Dansk
Svenska
Norsk
हिन्दी
Bridge players constantly argue about the ‘best’ bidding systems and conventions. Strong Club or Natural? With or without relays? Standard or 2/1? Weak or strong No-Trump? Was Blue Club really better than the natural systems in the 1950s and 1960s? Is Two-way Stayman as good as Stayman and transfers? Disciplined or undisciplined weak twos – which work better? And many, many more…
Well, now we have the answer to those questions, provided by exhaustive analysis and the results of computer simulations. And not only which is better, but also with how much, typically tested in thousands of 24-board IMP matches.
Player skill is eliminated, and bidding methods can be judged solely on their own merits, playing the same deals via the same AI software. It is as objective a test as modern technology can provide.
And the results may not be what you would expect…
CRITICS’ VIEWPOINT
74% of the people reviewing this book on Amazon have given it 5 or 4 stars.
On the Author
Jan Eric Larsson (Sweden) is a professor in artificial intelligence at Lund University in southern Sweden and manager of a small software company that delivers intelligent monitoring and diagnosis systems for national power grids. He is also one of Sweden’s top ten tournament directors and the chairperson of the Swedish Bridge Laws Commission.
Responses